Leeds: Orta in Phillips contract talks

Leeds United are in ongoing talks regarding a new deal for central midfielder Kalvin Phillips.

What’s the talk?

That’s according to a recent report by The Telegraph, who claim that, despite the interest of Manchester City, Liverpool and Aston Villa, Victor Orta is in ongoing talks with the 26-year-old concerning an extension of his current contract at Elland Road.

The report goes on to state that, despite the midfielder being high on Pep Guardiola’s transfer wishlist and Jurgen Klopp also keeping a very close eye on the situation of the England international this summer, an exit from LS11 is not guaranteed in the coming months.

Supporters will be buzzing

Considering the world-class player that Phillips has developed into over the past few seasons, the news that the midfielder could end up staying at Elland Road beyond the closure of the summer transfer window on September 1 is sure to have left supporters of the club buzzing.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-leeds-united-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-much-more-2″ title=”Read the latest Leeds news, transfer rumours and more!”]

Indeed, the £45m-rated talent undoubtedly proved his ability at the highest level of the English game over his 29 Premier League appearances in 2020/21, scoring one goal, providing two assists and creating five big chances for his teammates, as well as making an average of 1.2 key passes, taking 0.5 shots and completing 0.7 dribbles per game.

The £38k-per-week midfielder who Lewis Cook dubbed “unreal” also impressed in metrics more typical of his position, making an average of 1.6 interceptions, 2.6 tackles, 1.7 clearances, completing 41.0 passes and winning 5.3 duels – at a success rate of 52% – per fixture.

These returns saw the 26-year-old earn a rather astonishing seasonal SofaScore match rating of 7.21, not only ranking him as his club’s best performer in the league but also as the ninth-best midfielder in the division as a whole.

Furthermore, while a hamstring injury limited his game time in 2021/22, the 19-time capped international still managed to impress over his 20 league fixtures, providing one assist and creating one big chance for his teammates, in addition to making an average of 1.2 interceptions, 2.7 tackles, 38.9 passes, 3.5 long balls and winning 4.5 duels per game.

As such, it is clear for all to see just how huge a coup retaining the services of Phillips would be for Leeds this summer, with the fact that Orta is discussing the possibility of a new deal for the Whites’ academy product undoubtedly being fantastic news for everyone involved with the club.

AND in other news: Leeds could land their next £60m talent with Orta now in talks for “interesting” deal

Leeds plotting Lewis O’Brien bid

An update has emerged on Leeds United’s pursuit of Huddersfield’s Lewis O’Brien heading into the summer transfer window.

What’s the talk?

According to The Sun, Whites chief Victor Orta is plotting a fresh £10m bid to sign the midfielder ahead of the 2022/23 campaign, after missing out on a deal for him last year.

The report claimed that his current club would attempt to offer him a new contract if they won the play-off final but they went on to lose 1-0 to Nottingham Forest at Wembley.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-leeds-united-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-much-more-2″ title=”Read the latest Leeds news, transfer rumours and more!”]

Big Mateusz Klich upgrade

Leeds can land a big upgrade on the Poland international by bringing O’Brien to Elland Road in the upcoming window.

In the Premier League, Klich averaged an unimpressive SofaScore rating of 6.67 in 33 appearances as he lost 60% of his duels. He failed to turn in good performances on a regular basis and struggled with the physicality of the games, which is why he is currently a weakling in the side.

O’Brien, meanwhile, won 56% of his individual battles in the Championship – winning 7.5 duels per game – and has earned a reputation for being a battler in the middle of the park.

Former Huddersfield goalkeeper Matt Glennon previously lauded the midfielder’s engine, saying: “He closes down until the 95th, 96th minute, still running to the corners, stopping defenders, he’s got unlimited energy.

“Lewis O’Brien wants to put the hard yards in and wants to be at the very top of where he can get to. He’s one of those lads who works ridiculously hard which, for me, is your minimum in any league, but he’s got that quality, the drop of a shoulder, that strength to keep people off him, a low centre of gravity to glide past people, arm aloft when they try to knock him off the ball.”

The gem also impressed in possession as he chipped in three goals and three assists as he created 1.0 chances per game. This is along with his 3.0 tackles and interceptions per match and an excellent average SofaScore rating of 7.00.

He has shown, albeit in the second tier, that he can excel as a box-to-box midfielder and he has plenty of room left to grow at the age of 23. Marsch can work with him over time to help him fulfill his potential but, in the short-term, his statistics suggest that he can be an immediate upgrade on Klich.

O’Brien can offer a level of physicality that the Poland international has been unable to provide, whilst also possessing the quality on the ball to function as part of the team on the ball.

AND in other news, Orta eyeing Leeds swoop for “exceptional” £20k-p/w “example”, Marsch needs him badly…

Wolves: Injury expert relays injury fears

Injury expert and Sky Sports contributor Ben Dinnery has relayed a concerning update coming out of Wolves ahead of the Premier League run-in. 

The lowdown: What’s at stake…

As things stand the Wanderers sit in eighth position in the table with five games remaining starting with the visit of Brighton & Hove Albion to Molineux on Saturday.

Still with a realistic chance of earning European football for next term, Bruno Lage’s side will complete the 2021/22 campaign against title-chasing Liverpool at Anfield having faced Chelsea, Manchester City and Norwich City between now and then.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/all-the-latest-from-wolves-4/” title=”All the latest from Wolves!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

However, the Portuguese manager looks set to be without one key figure for the all-important final weeks…

The latest: Kilman out

Taking to Twitter, Dinnery relayed Lage’s answer during the pre-match press conference and cited a report detailing a season-ending injury for Max Kilman.

“Kilman could miss the rest of the season. ‘It will be hard for him to return,’ said Bruno Lage. ‘We have 25 days in front of us, and I don’t believe he will recover. He twisted his ankle, and we need to understand what is the problem.'”

The report from Express & Star explains that the 24-year-old suffered an ankle injury in training that is still being assessed to discover the true severity.

Talismanic midfielder Ruben Neves and winger Daniel Podence also remain sidelined for the meeting in the Midlands.

The verdict: Big miss

Losing Kilman for the remainder of the season is an undoubted blow as Wolves continue their push for Europe.

Prior to the setback central defender had made 34 appearances across all competitions, winning 2.2 aerial duels, 2.6 ground duels and making 1.5 interceptions on average per match in 30 league outings (Sofascore).

Forging an impressive partnership alongside Conor Coady and Romain Saiss for the most part, Kilman had been indexed to a number of top-flight clubs back in February following an impressive breakthrough campaign.

Albeit ill-timed, this injury could perhaps deter suitors and allow Lage to reintegrate the ace back into the ranks in the summer.

In other news, Wolves are reportedly eyeing up a move for an exciting player. Find out who it is here.

'Inches away from being Colossus Brathwaite'

The reactions to a stunning innings from Carlos Brathwaite that fell short of a few inches from clinching the win for West Indies

ESPNcricinfo staff23-Jun-2019

The finish was made even more memorable with Ian Bishop calling it on the live broadcast, bringing back memories of ‘Carlos Brathwaite! Remember The Name.’ from the 2016 World T20 final.

If we mention Kolkata 2016, how can we forget Ben Stokes?

And we saw some sportsmanship on and off the field.

View this post on Instagram

What a game! Super hitting @ricky.26 @cricketworldcup #cwc19

A post shared by Ross Taylor (@rossltaylor3) on Jun 22, 2019 at 2:36pm PDT

</center

Hopefully, there are better days and weeks coming up at the World Cup.

Surrey set to compete on all three fronts

ESPNcricinfo previews Surrey’s prospects for the 2017 season

George Dobell03-Apr-2017Last season:


In: Scott Borthwick, Mark Stoneman (both Durham), Kevin Pietersen (T20)
Out: Steven Davies (Somerset), Gary Wilson (Derbyshire), James Burke (loan, Leicestershire), Azhar Mahmood (released)
Overseas: Kumar Sangakkara (SL), Aaron Finch (Aus, T20).2016 in a nutshell
After seven games of the Championship season, things looked grim for Surrey. They were bottom of the table with four losses and no wins and they had a glut of injuries to their seamers, in particular. But the depth of their squad helped them to a run of three wins in four and a mid-table finish. They started slowly in the Royal London Cup, too, losing three of their first four games. But then they won their last three completed games to progress to the knock-out stages. A masterful century from Kumar Sangakkara sealed the quarter-final but, for the second year in succession, they produced a lame performance in the final at Lord’s. They failed to qualify for the knock-out stages of T20 – a major disappointment for a well-resourced squad with a huge support base – but, on the whole, this was an encouraging season for a newly promoted side containing many developing players.2017 prospects
There is no reason Surrey should not seriously compete in all three formats. In Mark Stoneman, who will open, and Scott Borthwick, they have recruited two fine, highly-motivated top-order players from Durham who will strengthen the batting considerably. With Mark Footitt, Stuart Meaker and the Curran brothers fit and firing, they have a nicely balanced seam attack, with Matt Dunn too good to endure a second poor season in succession. And while they will miss Jason Roy for much of the Royal London Cup, a Blast top four of Finch, Roy, Kevin Pietersen and, for a while, Sangakkara is mouthwatering. Another overseas T20 signing is also anticipated. Jade Dernbach remains, whatever his England record, one of the best white-ball bowlers in the land and in Zafar Ansari and Gareth Batty they have a spin attack deemed good enough to have played Test cricket in recent months. It’s a strong squad of which much is expected. But the level of expectation is always a burden at one of the few clubs where the salary cap is an issue.In charge
It’s not so long since Alec Stewart was director of cricket at a club in Division Two. And, in a league in which 25% of the teams will be relegated, Stewart will be desperately keen to demonstrate the progress the club has made with, at worst, a season without any relegation worries. Batty continues as captain, though Rory Burns is expected to deputise at times, with Michael di Venuto the head coach who has lured Stoneman, a player much in his image, to The Oval.Key player
Burns is not one of the most high-profile Surrey players, but he is among the most valuable. A solid opening batsman – he was the club’s highest run-scorer in the Championship last year – he is also likely to win more opportunity as keeper now that Steven Davies and Gary Wilson have moved elsewhere. He remains very much Ben Foakes’ deputy but, over a long season, opportunities are likely to arise. Most importantly, though, Burns is also the club’s vice-captain. And with Batty, the captain, unlikely to play every game – on early season pitches, the spin-bowling duties may well be fulfilled by Ansari – Burns could be in charge rather more than anticipated. It’s not impossible he could end up opening, keeping and captaining in some matches.Bright young thing
Foakes had to wait a while for an opportunity – being understudy to James Foster will do that to a young keeper – but, given his chance at Surrey in 2016, he more than lived up to expectations. While he is not quite, at this stage, the finished article, he is the natural successor to keepers such as Foster and Chris Read: good with his hands and his feet, only Tim Ambrose completed more Championship dismissals. In a world of pretenders, he is the real thing. He can really bat, too. He averaged over 40 in the Championship and nearly 50 in the Royal London Cup. He might well be England’s next Test keeper. Dominic Sibley, who may well bat at No. 6 in the Championship side, is another worth following.ESPNcricinfo verdict
It is true there have been times in recent years when – for understandable reasons – Surrey may have failed to strike a balance between development and recruitment. Leaving aside the birthplace argument for now, they appear to have a pleasing balance of home-grown talent (Sibley, Burns, Meaker, Ansari, Roy, Dunn, the Currans et al) and recruited (Foakes, Sangakkara, Batty, Borthwick, Stoneman et al) that can both challenge for trophies and fulfil their brief for developing England players. They should challenge in all formats.Bet365 odds: Specsavers Championship: 5-1; NatWest Blast 9-1; Royal London Cup 15-2

Decoding the West Indies Under-19 success story

The beauty of their win wasn’t in their preparation, but in their execution at crunch moments

Mohammad Isam in Mirpur14-Feb-2016Keacy Carty and Keemo Paul batted for 20.3 overs to wipe out the 69 remaining runs needed to win their first Under-19 World Cup title. There were pockets where an inevitable collapse looked a possibility, but the pair batted with the serenity and confidence that belied their age. Incredibly, Paul struck the only four and six in the partnership. Carty’s answer when asked if it was a conscious effort gave you a peek into his temperament.”Singles could have done it. We just needed 146 from 300 balls,” he said.Wait, that’s not how West Indies do it these days, do they?A careful, and not carefree approach, did the trick. Every run they took in the unbroken sixth-wicket stand indicated their willingness to grind it out and not look for glory hits. At no stage did they look nervous. They didn’t seem to mind the odd miss or the fact that they were made to scrap and look ungainly, particularly against Mayank Dagar, the left-arm spinner, who troubled them with his loop and flight.What they also showed during the course of the partnership was the hunger to succeed and not leave the task up to someone else.Equally impressive was their ability to think out of the box. Paul’s Mankad on Richard Ngarava that turned around their campaign andTevin Imlach’s underarm flick to catch Rishabh Pant off guard in the final were just a few examples. Watching them come out and play like free-spirited tigers, you could sense their changed mindset and approach.The beauty of their win wasn’t in their preparation, but their execution at crunch moments. Unlike some of the other sides, West Indies played all of three matches together as a group against Bangladesh, who had played 29 matches between the two editions. Shimron Hetmyer’s side came into the tournament on the back of a 3-0 whitewash. They started slowly, but found their bearings when it mattered.
That they managed to pull through as a side despite playing a handful of games together in the build-up could perhaps be put down to their Under-15 and Under-17 development structure, where a few of the side’s members played together.In between 2014 and 2016, most of the players featured in the regional Under-19 tournament; handful of them played first-class or List A matches for their respective sides. To make up for the lack of cricket together as a group, the WICB organised three conditioning camps, the first of which was held in Barbados after the Easter holidays last year.Then they got together a group of 18 in Jamaica in August, while the final touches of their preparation was added in Grenada in December. Interestingly, their late replacement, the fast bowler Chemar Holder, was not in any of these camps.Even as some of the other sides played practice matches in the build-up to the tournament, West Indies Under-19 players had to make do with conditioning camps•Getty ImagesOn the eve of the final, Hetmyer said that the team was hurt by the three losses to Bangladesh, but insisted all the players learnt a lot and tried to use their experience of the conditions better. “The guys were hurting after that series, but each and every member of the squad picked up from there.”Former West Indies fast bowler Ian Bishop, who followed this team throughout the campaign as a TV commentator, said that he felt the Mankad incident spurred on the team. “I think the Zimbabwe win and the whole Mankad issue, whether you agree it was right or wrong, spurred them on,” he said. “Some of the issue that was said about Keemo Paul and team, was disgraceful. I don’t think it’s a coincidence, because they just lifted their game after that. The passage of cricket was untidy. I didn’t see the Fiji game, but they showed potential against England even if they lost.”Bishop said while their preparation was far from ideal, the tournament was an indication that there was still plenty of talent underneath the surface in the Caribbean. “They didn’t have ideal preparation and it should not serve as the template going into the next World Cup,” he observed. “But what the win says is that there is tremendous amount of talent. We don’t have the volume of bowlers and batsmen in the past, but I think we have enough talent and these guys have proved that it needs to be harnessed.”This coming together has been the long lost story of West Indies cricket. A group of teenagers have now shown the way, whether it is through sheer guts to effect a Mankad or run a batsman who was just leaving the ball and taking a step out. In the heat of the battle, their realization that Mohammad Saifuddin was only bowling yorkers and it can be tackled by a shorter back-lift and low intensity batting, said much about their awareness which should win a lot of praise.The likes of Paul, Imlach and Shamar Springer now have full cricket careers. But they are from the West Indies; the conflicting West Indies, the dying West Indies. The West Indies that is only in nostalgia and one whose future seems uncertain.When they win a World Cup in the sub-continent by beating Pakistan, Bangladesh and India in the knockout stages and do so the hard way, you wouldn’t want to give up on them so soon.

The six yet to cement their World Cup tickets

ESPNcricinfo selects six players with World Cup places to prove

Andrew Fidel Fernando and Alan Gardner25-Nov-2014Ajantha Mendis
If author Agatha Christie had been active a few decades later, she might have used Ajantha Mendis for inspiration. Once the poster-boy for mystery spin, the enigma of Ajantha has stretched far beyond his dexterous fingers and has consumed the narrative of his career. Is he a great bowler, or a mediocre one? Sometimes he is both in the same series. He played two matches against India. In one, he was tonked for 70 for no wicket in his seven overs. In the next, he almost won Sri Lanka the game, claiming four key (if expensive) wickets, on a turning track. There are doubts about whether he can be effective in Australia and New Zealand, but also theories on how he is a force against teams that have not played him much. The selectors will hope at least they will have decoded Ajantha by the end of the England series.Kusal Perera
Few batsmen pack as much power into their shots, but despite the occasional rapid start Kusal has provided, he has been brittle in recent months. None of his last 12 innings have fetched 50, and of his five most recent knocks, two have been ducks, and two more were single-figure scores. Sri Lanka have given him so much rope because when he does make runs, they are high in impact. He will have another chance at the start of the series, and if his 56 from 74 balls in the warm-up match is anything to go by, perhaps he will tone down his aggression, in a bid to win a World Cup place.Jeevan Mendis


A bits-and-pieces allrounder who plays with immense heart, even if he has limited ability, Jeevan has been thrown a lifeline, just as his career seemed to be on the wane. He has been in good form with his legspin, taking regular wickets in domestic cricket, but Sri Lanka will want more from him with the bat, as they look to strengthen their lower middle order for the World Cup. He is an excellent fielder, and a fine batsman against spin, but his performance against England’s seamers may determine whether he earns a trip to New Zealand in January.Alex Hales
Seemingly the coming man of England’s 50-over side, Hales is apparently already going. After just four starts alongside Alastair Cook at the top of the order, in which he scored an underwhelming 92 with a strike rate of 68.65, Hales has been eased aside in favour of Moeen Ali’s greater all-round offering, though he should still get to stake his World Cup claim on the tour. A tall man with long “levers” – as England love to call his appendages – Hales is a sui generis hitter who really has no like-for-like rival and therefore seems secure in his squad place. But when his chance does arise, Hales needs to prove that his T20 heavy-artillery approach can be tailored to a longer format.Ravi Bopara
Dropped from the previous series against India, Bopara is on notice that his potential in an England shirt needs fulfilling. Frustratingly talented yet dozy in equal measure, he has failed to make himself indispensible over the course of 108 ODIs and was not in the XI for the only warm-up match England have managed to squeeze in around the bad weather. Cook knows what his Essex team-mate is capable of and it may be that England want to give Ben Stokes first crack at the No. 7 spot but, with plenty of allrounders to call upon and James Taylor offering the potential for fun-size fireworks as a specialist batsman, there is pressure on Bopara to prove he is worth a third World Cup shot.Chris Jordan
Capable of bowling close to 90mph, a superb fielder and able to give the ball a thump, Jordan has the ingredients to make Mr Kipling rub his hands together in delight. Unfortunately, something appears to have gone slightly wrong in the baking process and Jordan’s performances have become increasingly flaky in one-day cricket, where his habit of firing wides down the leg side is costly. He bowled five overs for 48 in England’s otherwise comfortable win over Sri Lanka A on Friday and sent down 12 wides in his only appearance during the India series. He is relaxed about criticism of his run-up and grip on the ball but needs to focus on improving his end results if he isn’t to be edged out by the left-armer Harry Gurney.

All-round obsession

From Stephen Vagg, Australia
The Single Biggest Problem with English Cricket – the ‘Allrounder Obssession’ The recent selection of England’s cricket team has drawn attention once again to the blight that has damaged English cricket for the past

Cricinfo25-Feb-2013Stephen Vagg, Australia
The Single Biggest Problem with English Cricket – the ‘Allrounder Obssession’ The recent selection of England’s cricket team has drawn attention once again to the blight that has damaged English cricket for the past twenty years – the obssession with finding an allrounder.Ever since the glory days of Ian Botham the English selectors have persisted with all rounders, in the foolish belief this somehow gives the team an extra player – ignoring the fact that this usually means you have one (sometimes two) less. Cricket is all about the basics, and the basics of team selection is that you pick batsmen who can bat, bowlers who can bowl, and keepers who can keep. You should only pick an allrounder if (a) they are good enough at one of those jobs to justify their place in the team (eg Kapil Dev, Imran, Gilchrist) or (b) back them up with another all rounder.During the last Ashes, England’s obssession with having an all rounder saw them pick a not very good keeper (Jones) over a world class one (Read) for his batting, an average spin bowler (Giles) over a world class one (Panesar) for the same reason, and played an out of form batsman (Flintoff) at six instead of a proper batsman – to enable them to play a fifth bowler. It came a cropper and it should have.Now they are picking Flintoff, a not-very-good-test-batsman (at the moment) to play at six, Broad, a not-very-good test bowler, at eight because of his batting. Some people will go “what about the 2005 Ashes then?” and that’s fair enough – but the team structure worked then because Flintoff, Jones and Giles kept up their ends with the bat. The moment they lost batting form (any one of them), it didn’t work – and that’s where you get into difficulty, because a fast bowler, keeper and spinner should be in the team on their basis to bowl fast, keep and spin the ball, not score runs.The number of dud all rounders England have tried since Botham is staggering: Derek Pringle, Chris Lewis, De Freitas, Dominic Cork, David Capel, Craig White, Ronnie Irani, Alex Tudor, and Ben and Adam Hollioake are just some. These players all had their moments but their presence in the team almost always threw out the balance. They got some runs but no wickets or wickets but no runs; they boosted the bowling a little or weakened the batting a bit, or weakened the batting but boosted the bowling. They made the selectors see-saw between Jack Russell and Alec Stewart, just as they now chop and change with Read, Jones, Prior and Nixon. But such is the lure and glamour of the all rounder that no one seems to care.I like Freddie Flintoff – who could not like Freddie Flintoff? He’s a good enough player to be picked in the team, but as a bowler – he’s not good enough to bat at six. Stuart Broad should not be in the test team as a bowler mainly because he’s a “not-bad” number eight batsman. That’s madness. England had the balance right in the third test – play six batters, and Flintoff at seven. Yes, they lost that test. But remember that England were put in a winning position in that test because of the efforts of a number six batsman (Collingwood). Does anyone think that would have happened if Flintoff had played at six? They just needed to keep their nerve.But England’s selectors snapped under pressure – and now it looks like they’re going to win the 4th test, they’ll keep making this mistake, and they’ll keep losing and wonder why. The great thing about test cricket is that it finds you out in the end. England are trying to take short cuts, and they will come undone. Until they learn that lesson they will always remain a second-rate side.

The story of a dynasty

An acclaimed new documentary on the West Indies teams of the 70s and 80s goes beyond charting their on-field dominance

Liam Brickhill21-May-2011The best documentaries break out of the boundaries of their subject matter to paint a picture that is altogether larger and more complex, becoming something more than the sum of their parts. Films that manage this feat enthrall even those without much knowledge of their subjects. , which charts the rise of the great West Indian side of the 1970s and 80s, is just such a film.With a heady combination of testimonies from several West Indian players whose names – Michael Holding, Viv Richards, Colin Croft, Andy Roberts, Joel Garner and Clive Lloyd – would honour a cricketing Hall of Fame, a clear-eyed view of the turbulent politics and race relations of the time, and a killer dub and reggae soundtrack (not to mention a scene-stealing cameo from Bunny Wailer) that perfectly complements some stunning archive footage, has reached an ever-widening audience since its initial showing at the London Film Festival in October last year. Its popularity has led to a re-release in cinemas across the United Kingdom on May 20.”I think it’s just a great story that needed to be told,” Michael Holding, a vital part of that West Indian side’s success and one of the most fearsome fast bowlers to have played the game, told ESPNcricinfo. “It has great historical background, it has political background, it has so many different things, and perhaps that is the reason why so many people have been attracted to it.”To be a part of that West Indies team, and to be a part of so much success, was great. I look back on that and think I was so fortunate to be involved in West Indies cricket at that time, because I think it was just a perfect storm that came together.”The film details the ingredients that went into creating one of the most dominant cricket teams of all time, and one that went unbeaten in a Test series for 15 years. The success was built on a battery of athletic fast bowlers, attacking batsmen, an inspirational leader, and most importantly, an idea that they were not simply smiling “calypso cricketers” but could, as Bunny Wailer puts it, become “like slaves whipping the asses of masters”. Beyond the cricket, a strong cultural identity was being formed. This is the touchstone that is returned to time and again, as a group of proud black men show the world they can play the game as well as anyone ever has, if not better. Indeed, Richards is Rastafarian in everything but hairstyle, we are told.All of which leaves a lasting impression of the wider significance of events taking place on the field, expanding the film’s appeal considerably. But in attempting to reach out to a non-cricketing audience, there are times when it feels as though the core demographic of cricket fans, for whom Richards’ batting average is more important than his beliefs, are somewhat short-changed. Scores and statistics are largely lacking from the screen and certain important events, such as the 1979 World Cup triumph, are glossed over.That message, though, is undoubtedly a worthy one, and is bolstered by the fact that the story is presented through the eyes of the players involved, rather than using a procession of talking heads and experts, and each interview presents the narrative from a slightly different angle. Holding’s treacle-toned contributions are among the highlights, and he proffers several of the eloquently persuasive pronouncements that have become such a feature of his commentary in recent years. Yet he readily admits he didn’t think so deeply into matters at the time, so focused was he on the task at hand: cricket.

While the story of West Indies’ golden years makes for stirring viewing, a cinematic version of the current situation would at times be more akin to an awkward combination of horror and comedy

“When I was actually playing cricket I wasn’t thinking about any political ramifications of what I was doing. I was out there trying to play a cricket match, trying to take wickets, trying to win Test matches for my country.”We eventually got to realise that [we stood for something bigger than the cricket] the more we played and went overseas. The more you play overseas, and the more you interact with the Caribbean people overseas, you realise the implications of what you are doing. And when you do well, they feel so proud. They can walk the streets of whatever country they are in, proud to be confidently West Indian, because they are associated with success.”While the story of West Indies’ golden years makes for stirring viewing, a cinematic version of the current situation would at times be more akin to an awkward combination of horror and comedy. Most troublingly, in a region where parochialism rules and “the West Indies” only really exists in cricket terms, there is no longer any great unifier – something that all great teams require.”I think the problem now is that West Indian cricketers see cricket as a way of making a living, nothing else,” said Holding. “They don’t understand exactly what cricket means to Caribbean people and how it affected peoples’ lives.”Money is not just what people play for, it is also what all the cricket boards also aspire towards. Even the ICC, all they think about is money. The problem is definitely deeper than just the cricketers themselves. I don’t blame the cricketers so much. People can’t just blame children; you have to look at the parents as well. If the parents are doing the right thing, the children will follow.”The film’s producers are keen to reach out to a younger audience, and schoolchildren will be invited to free screenings of Fire In Babylon in different locations during Pakistan’s current tour, an idea enthusiastically backed by Holding.”I wouldn’t be bothering with the older folk. Young trees bend a lot easier than old trees. So I’d be interested in getting this documentary into the schools and into the young people of the Caribbean, so they can then focus their minds on that and be associated with that from an early age. These cricketers now are not going to change. You’re not going to get them all of a sudden to stop thinking money and start thinking West Indies, and thinking pride and region. That isn’t going to happen.”It remains to be seen whether the story of the golden age of West Indian cricket will inspire the young cricketers of the Caribbean, and ultimately it might be argued that what the youth really need is a new brand of hero from the current crop of national cricketers. Darren Sammy and his men, dismissed as a poor imitation of their forefathers, nevertheless showed in the win over Pakistan in Guyana that grit, perseverance and military-medium pace can also produce results. It wasn’t quite one of the demolitions of old, but with another “perfect storm” of cricketing talent unlikely, it’s a start.Fire in Babylon
directed by Stevan Riley
87 min; 2011

Out for 99, and the highest totals without a century

Most prolific against England, and in first-class cricket

Steven Lynch25-Aug-2007The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questions about (almost) any aspect of cricket:


Sachin Tendulkar has twice been out for 99 in ODIs he’s played over the last two months
© Getty Images

I’ve just watched Sachin Tendulkar get out for 99 – again. How many batsmen have been out for 99 in ODIs? asked Mathaven Moodley from Canada
A lot of people also asked about this, after Sachin Tendulkar was out for 99 in Friday’s match in Bristol. As this list shows, there have now been 20 instances of a batsman being out one short of a century in ODIs – and Tendulkar has been unlucky enough to make the last two, having also been out for 99 against South Africa in Belfast in June. Sanath Jayasuriya is the only other player who has twice been out for 99 in ODIs.Was India’s 329 in Bristol last week the highest ODI total without a century? asked Midhush from Australia, among others
The highest ODI total not to include a century is actually South Africa’s 392 for 6 against Pakistan in Centurion in February. The highest individual score then was 88 not out, by Jacques Kallis.There were six run-outs in the first ODI between Zimbabwe and South Africa last week, including five in Zimbabwe’s innings. Is this a record? asked Javed Rentiya from the United States
The five run-outs in Zimbabwe’s innings in last week’s match at Bulawayo equalled the record for an ODI: it has happened eight times before, most famously to Australia in the first World Cup final at Lord’s in 1975. For a full list, click here. The record for both sides in an ODI is eight, in the match between New Zealand and India in Napier in 1998-99. There have also been five ODIs with seven run-outs , and 18 previous ones with six, as this list shows.The batsman who was at the other end when Hanif Mohammad was run out for 499 apparently died a couple of weeks later. Who was he, and what did he die of? asked Jack Coetzee from South Africa
This unfortunate player was Abdul Aziz, an 18-year-old who was Karachi’s wicketkeeper in that match, against Bahawalpur in January 1959, when Hanif Mohammad was run out for 499. Abdul Aziz was indeed batting at the end, although I don’t think Hanif’s run-out was his fault. That match was the semi-final of the 1958-59 Quaid-e-Azam Trophy. The final was played a week later, and Abdul Aziz was hit on the chest by a ball from Combined Services offspinner Dildar Awan while batting in the first innings. This apparently aggravated an unsuspected heart condition, and he died on the way to hospital – in some scorecards he is recorded as “absent dead” in the second innings of the match, which Karachi still won.Further to a question you had recently, I know Don Bradman has scored most runs in Tests against England, but who leads the way in ODIs? asked Daniel Marrin from Saltburn
The leading runscorer in ODIs against England is Viv Richards, with 1619 in 36 matches, at the imposing average of 57.82. Allan Border is next with 1302, while Desmond Haynes (1185), Ricky Ponting (1110), Sanath Jayasuriya (1102), Adam Gilchrist (1087) and Sachin Tendulkar (1016 after his 99 in Bristol) have also passed 1000.I was looking at the records for first-class runs. Unsurprisingly they’re dominated by Englishmen from before the war, but I noticed Gordon Greenidge is the leading non-Englishman. However, I didn’t see a single Australian above 30,000 … can you please tell me which Aussie has most first-class runs? asked Matt Cottle
Gordon Greenidge (37,354 runs) is indeed the leading non-Englishman on the first-class run-scorers’ list, and that only puts him 25th overall. The only current player above him is Graeme Hick, who passed 40,000 runs earlier this season. The leading Australian is none other than Don Bradman, who made 28,067 first-class runs at the amazing average of 95.14. Allan Border comes next with 27,131, just ahead of Mark Waugh (26,885), while Stuart Law has 25,991 as I write.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus